Michael Palmedo

Economics, Trade Policy, Intellectual Property

Menu

An Economic Justification for Open Access to Essential Medicine Patents in Developing Countries


Journal article


Sean Flynn, Aidan Hollis, Michael Palmedo
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 37(2), 2009, pp. 184-208

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Flynn, S., Hollis, A., & Palmedo, M. (2009). An Economic Justification for Open Access to Essential Medicine Patents in Developing Countries. The Journal of Law, Medicine &Amp; Ethics, 37(2), 184–208.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Flynn, Sean, Aidan Hollis, and Michael Palmedo. “An Economic Justification for Open Access to Essential Medicine Patents in Developing Countries.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37, no. 2 (2009): 184–208.


MLA   Click to copy
Flynn, Sean, et al. “An Economic Justification for Open Access to Essential Medicine Patents in Developing Countries.” The Journal of Law, Medicine &Amp; Ethics, vol. 37, no. 2, 2009, pp. 184–208.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{sean2009a,
  title = {An Economic Justification for Open Access to Essential Medicine Patents in Developing Countries},
  year = {2009},
  issue = {2},
  journal = {The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics},
  pages = {184-208},
  volume = {37},
  author = {Flynn, Sean and Hollis, Aidan and Palmedo, Michael}
}

Abstract

This paper offers an economic rationale for compulsory licensing of needed medicines in developing countries. The patent system is based on a trade-off between the "deadweight losses" caused by market power and the incentive to innovate created by increased profits from monopoly pricing during the period of the patent. However, markets for essential medicines under patent in developing countries with high income inequality are characterized by highly convex demand curves, producing large deadweight losses relative to potential profits when monopoly firms exercise profit-maximizing pricing strategies. As a result, these markets are systematically ill-suited to exclusive marketing rights, a problem which can be corrected through compulsory licensing. Open licenses that permit any qualified firm to supply the market on the same terms, such as may be available under licenses of right or essential facility legal standards, can be used to mitigate the negative effects of government-granted patents, thereby increasing overall social welfare.





Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in